“‘The Giver’ sort of bombed at the box office this weekend” links

Admin August 19, 2014 0

“‘The Giver’ sort of bombed at the box office this weekend” links


FFN_GG_TheGiver_Prem_081114_51500182

The Giver bombed at the box office this weekend. [Buzzfeed]
Rachel Bilson is having a really cute pregnancy. [Popoholic]
I’m still not sure what to think of Masters of Sex this season. [LaineyGossip]
More photos of Tom Hardy with puppies. [Dlisted]
John Oliver covers the situation in Ferguson. [Pajiba]
This guy has amazing freckles. [A Socialite Life]
Kristen Bell Kerry Washington are friends? [Go Fug Yourself]
Drake sucks at representing the Toronto Raptors. [The Blemish]
Lily Allen flashes her boobs at the V Festival. [Moe Jackson]
Recap of Kim Zolciak’s Don’t Be Tardy. [Reality Tea]
Simon Cowell wants to bring Betty Boop to the big screen. [ICYDK]
I think this is the first time I’ve seen Elizabeth Banks’ kids? [Celebrity Baby Scoop]
Elizabeth Vargas is back in rehab. [Wonderwall]
Your favorite Walking Dead character might be gay. [IDLY]

FFN_GG_TheGiver_Prem_081114_51500187


 

Featured Links

- Britney Spears lip syncs to Sia [D-Listed]

- Joey Lauren Adams looks great [Lainey Gossip]

- Cara Delevingne wears the pizza onesie [Go Fug Yourself]

- Downton Abbey cast supports water charity [Pajiba]

- Best worst looks this week [Evil Beet]

- Blind items revealed: Biel Timberlake [CDAN]

- Olivia Munn’s casual style [Celebslam]

- Neil Patrick Harris denies relationship problems [INO]

- Ashley Greene poses in a parking lot [Moe Jackson]

- Mom arrested for cursing out her kids [Starcasm]

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

37 Responses to ““‘The Giver’ sort of bombed at the box office this weekend” links”

<!–

    –>

    1. lunchcoma says:

      I saw the previews for The Giver when I went to Guardians, and just seeing how much they aged up the main characters was enough to talk me out of going to see it. It’s a great book, but I don’t think it was ever the right material for the sexy teen thriller they apparently wanted to make it into.

      In happier news, John Oliver is awesome, and his show has pretty much replaced The Daily Show in my viewing rotation. There’s less of it, but there’s so much less filler, and he does a great job of talking about complicated issues in clear, funny ways.

      Report this comment as spam or abuse

      • bettyrose says:

        Everything you’ve said here …from The Giver preview to John Oliver are MTE!! I’m sure I’ll watch the Giver on cable someday, but no one in the theater needs to hear me grumbling about how such a great book deserves a more faithful movie.

        Report this comment as spam or abuse

        • Mel M says:

          Right there with you both. I have loved this book for years, I own it, it was the first time I heard my sons name (although he is not named after the character). So so disappointed in what they did with it. I had no desire to see it from the first trailer.

          Report this comment as spam or abuse

      • Tiffany :) says:

        I love John Oliver’s show. He makes great points in such a witty way.

        Report this comment as spam or abuse

      • Falula says:

        Yup, every single thing you said.

        Report this comment as spam or abuse

    2. Miss M says:

      It was an ok movie, the story had some potential but never really took off. Swift looks better with dark hair.

      Report this comment as spam or abuse

    3. Duchess-at-Large says:

      Taylor looks gorgeous. Is it just me or are she and Karli Kloss starting to morph in to the same person?

      Report this comment as spam or abuse

      • Chris says:

        I really like her frock here, I loathe the faerie princess look.
        Funny thing with Taylor Swift: I generally think *everyone* looks better with red lips….Angelina included. But not Taylor S….it adds 15 yrs to her, imo…..though I don’t see that on anyone else at all.

        Report this comment as spam or abuse

    4. cr says:

      Did the Giver actually bomb? No. It didn’t do as well as Weinstein and co. and probably hoped, but it’s not a bomb. The Expendables 3? Now that might be a bomb.

      Report this comment as spam or abuse

      • lunchcoma says:

        It cost $25-30 million and films need to take in roughly double their production cost to be profitable, so it seems like it may end up losing money, especially since it doesn’t seem like a film that will do extraordinarily well in foreign markets.

        That being said, Expendables 3 was a much, much bigger bomb.

        Report this comment as spam or abuse

      • McCall says:

        12 Million open at number 5 is pretty much a bomb. Low budget so will might make it but still no one is going to see this movie so it’s pretty much a bomb

        Report this comment as spam or abuse

      • FLORC says:

        I think because no one said it bombed outright sets your ocmment a bit out of line. “Sort of” really changes a lot of the meaning.

        Considering how Weinstein expected this movie to it did not do well and projection percentage wise it’s sort of a bomb thus far.

        Really, it didn’t have much of a chance against TMNT. I think without that and GotG people would have seen a movie like The Giver.
        People want to laugh and see action in the summer!

        Report this comment as spam or abuse

        • cr says:

          CB’s headline says ‘sort of’, the link says this: “The Giver bombed at the box office this weekend. [Buzzfeed]”
          I just find it amusing that Buzzfeed focused on The Giver, when it seems most other box office press is focusing on The Expendables.

          Report this comment as spam or abuse

        • FLORC says:

          Ah. Thanks cr.
          Either way I do think Weinstein Co considers this a loss.
          Now expendables 3! That was awful.

          Report this comment as spam or abuse

      • Virgilia Coriolanus says:

        I thought that it looked like a piece of crap. And I’ve seen the trailer a bunch of times on tv and I still don’t get what it’s about, other than it kind of reminded me of Equilibrium (in that they don’t have a choice, and they have injections).

        Plus there is such an overflow of YA books into movies right now. I mean, they got lucky with the Hunger Games, but other than that? Please stop. Wait a few years. Come up with something original.

        Report this comment as spam or abuse

        • cr says:

          The Giver novel came out in 1993, so it predates the YA resurgent quite a bit. The trailers sucked, as the first one pissed of those who read the novel, and it looked generically YA to everyone else.

          Report this comment as spam or abuse

        • Leaflet says:

          @VC,
          I’m going to have to disagree with you about the YA genre not having enough original material. It’s a genre like any other genre, so movies deserve to be made. No one ever tells the comedy or romance genre to go away. Plus the YA genre of movies are specifically for teens and tweens. One could correctly argue that there are not enough epic fantasy movies for teens because most movies are targeted either towards little kids or mainly has too much adult content for teens. I think teenagers are a demographic that is often forgotten, causing them to actually steer more towards movies that promote sex and violence because they don’t want to be stuck seeing “Frozen”. Teens like to go to theater too, and teens are also very impressionable. I think it a good thing that a parent can drop off their kids at a movie theater without having to worry about them not having age appropriate choices. I love this genre myself. It is my most favorite probably because it employs my imagination and the story lines have moral to them. Yeah, when I’m watching these movies like Divergent or Hunger Games, somehow I still feel that their still may be hope that young people will still be able to have good impressionable movies that won’t make their minds age in a bad way.

          Report this comment as spam or abuse

    5. Tiffany27 says:

      I always thought Daryl was asexual, which is why I think it’s so strange when people ship him with another character.

      Report this comment as spam or abuse

      • FLORC says:

        The thing is it doesn’t matter. People are trying to make this into a thing. They said it has been addressed and will continue to be addressed in the show. When Daryl isn’t busy surviving they are not hiding anything.

        I think people want him to be gay because of his conservative survivalist lifestyle.
        Unless it’s a part of the story line like Glen and Maggie, Rick, Lori, Shane. It’s not important.

        Report this comment as spam or abuse

        • Kori says:

          Yes, Norman Reedus addressed this somewhat back when the Carol/Daryl fans (which I am one of) started up. He said that, to him, Daryl has such an abused background that he doesn’t know how to related in an emotional, romantic way to anyone else. He may not even be able to sexually. And the Zombie Apocalypse makes it worse and better. He’s grown as a person within this group and it has given him a family and a purpose which has allowed for some healing. But at the same time you are fighting for your life every day and there’s a real risk in getting attached to anyone. But I’ve never gotten any sense that Daryl was gay and repressing it. People used to say it about Carol too because of her haircut. I loved when they addressed it with Carol and Axel, the prisoner. He outright said he thought she was gay because of it and she laughed at him. It was actually a sweet, little flirty moment.

          Report this comment as spam or abuse

    6. lucy2 says:

      I saw it over the weekend and liked it. I hadn’t read the book, but went with people who had, and they didn’t have high hopes but ended up liking it too.
      It may not have opened like some of the other YA book based films, but it also cost a fraction of their budgets, and will probably turn a profit when all is said and done.

      Report this comment as spam or abuse

      • Esmom says:

        That’s good to hear. My son read the book for English class last year and he said their teacher showed them the trailer and it did nothing to get them excited for the film. I’m going try to talk him into seeing it after all.

        Report this comment as spam or abuse

    7. Kiddo says:

      Thanks Kaiser. I don’t have HBO and really appreciate you linking as many John Oliver clips as possible. He is brilliant and I agree with his points on race. The militarization of police is insane. “Escalation of force”. “Die Mother F*er die”. Citizenry is the enemy of its government. The governor was profoundly patronizing.

      But money must be made selling military gear, money money money…

      Report this comment as spam or abuse

    8. Blythe says:

      She may not be everyone’s cup of tea, but Taylor looks absolutely stunning. She’s beautiful. I’m loving her style transformation.

      Report this comment as spam or abuse

      • Josefa says:

        Darker hair just brings her to a whole new level. She’s really pretty with her gold locks, but brown hair makes her absolutely stunning.

        Never been a fan of her music but I love her style, too.

        Report this comment as spam or abuse

        • Observer says:

          I think she looks best with her natural supercurly ‘fro like hair in her natural blond color. I don’t know why she insists on straightening her poor hair into submission. I can only imagine how long that takes and how much chemical shit she has to put into it only for it to look like a dried, fried, mop on the top of her head.
          No wonder she cut it short.

          Report this comment as spam or abuse

        • Miss M says:

          I said in the thread she looks better with dark hair too. She is pretty, but with the dark hair she is stunning!

          Report this comment as spam or abuse

    9. Mrs.Krabapple says:

      I read an article on the movie, where Jeff Bridges said he fought to keep the movie similar to the book, especially the kids’ ages. But the producers (i.e., Harvey Weinstein) wouldn’t budge and Bridges was given the choice to “walk away” from this project that he spent so many years on. It was really sad.

      Report this comment as spam or abuse

      • lunchcoma says:

        Ugh. Harvey Weinstein is The Worst. He’s great at marketing his movies, but he really needs to take a step back on the creative front because his impulses are often bad ones.

        Report this comment as spam or abuse

      • maybeiamcrazy says:

        Harvey Weinstein doesn’t give a shit about artistic value of a film. He aims his movies to be watched by an average movie-goer so when he produces a movie that might alienates his audience, he changes things. It is awful but it seems to be working well.

        Report this comment as spam or abuse

      • Alex says:

        well i was never going to see this because I would like hollywood to stop ruining my childhood but I’m not surprised it bombed. This is such a classic that people were already worried and the trailers pretty much did the rest. Making it a typical YA genre story was just the cherry on top. I wish filmmakers and editors would stop pandering to teens…they can handle complex stories. Did you know that THG was never supposed to have a love triangle? It was forced by the editor of the books. Stuff like that is not necessary for teens to read/watch. Sucks that Harvey painted Jeff into a corner…ugh

        Report this comment as spam or abuse

    10. Marianne says:

      I saw The Giver and it was good, but not great.

      Report this comment as spam or abuse

    11. Tiffany :) says:

      I love that dogs love Tom Hardy. It says something to me that they are drawn to him like a magnet. He must give off good vibes!

      Report this comment as spam or abuse

    12. Stephanie says:

      I saw the giver on Saturday. It was OK, but the best part of it was the actor who plays Jonas. He is so hot. He made me want to keep watching even during the slower parts.

      Report this comment as spam or abuse

    13. jwoolman says:

      Don’t they have to wait a while before declaring bombitude? Word of mouth advertising etc. Plus school is just starting up and maybe its audience will be more interested later when it gets dark earlier…

      Report this comment as spam or abuse

    Commenting Guidelines

    Celebitchy aims to be a friendly, welcoming site where people can discuss entertainment stories and current events in a lighthearted, safe environment without fear of harassment, excessive negativity, or bullying. Different opinions, backgrounds, ages, and nationalities are welcome here – hatred and bigotry are not. If you make racist or bigoted remarks, comment under multiple names, or wish death on anyone you will be banned. There are no second chances if you violate one of these basic rules.

    By commenting you agree to our comment policy

    Use the “Report this comment as spam or abuse” link to ask the moderators to delete a comment if it’s offensive. If your comment disappears, it may have been eaten by the spam filter. Please e-mail cbcomments at gmail.com to get it retrieved.

    You can sign up to get an image next to your name at Gravatar.com Thank you!

    Leave a comment

Leave A Response »